«Live» and media-mediated musical performance: a comparative analysis of piano, vocal, and choral interpretation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24195/artstudies.2026-2.20

Keywords:

«live» musical performance, media-mediated musical performance, piano interpretation, vocal interpretation, choral interpretation, ensemble performance.

Abstract

This article explores the transformation of «live» and media-mediated musical performance on the basis of piano, vocal, and choral interpretation. The aim of the study is to examine how musical interpretation changes under conditions of media-mediated performance and to conduct a comparative analysis of piano, vocal, and choral interpretation through the lens of the categories of “live” and media-mediated performance. The methodological framework is grounded in an interdisciplinary approach that combines art-historical, musicological, media-theoretical, and performative analysis, as well as conceptual-terminological, comparative, interpretive, and media-analytical methods. This perspective makes it possible to view performance simultaneously as an artistic act, a technologically mediated event, and a form of cultural presence. The study demonstrates that «live» performance cannot be reduced to the physical co-presence of performer and listener alone; rather, it has a spectral character and may be realized in in-person live, synchronous media-mediated, and asynchronous media-mediated formats. It is shown that media in the contemporary musical environment are not a neutral transmission channel, but an active factor in shaping the acoustic image, visual dramaturgy, the rhythm of reception, and the social organization of listening. In piano performance, the media environment intensifies the significance of sonic detail, registral balance, and controlled pedaling; in vocal performance, it foregrounds timbral proximity, the intimacy of expression, and the specifics of microphone-mediated sound; in choral performance, it most radically transforms the very principle of ensemble interaction, since latency, data transmission, and technical constraints complicate synchronous coordination and encourage asynchronous working models. At the same time, the article argues that digital formats do not eliminate interpretation, but rather shift it into another mode, in which the artistic outcome is formed through the interaction of the performer, the technical environment, and the mode of sound dissemination. The practical significance of the article lies in the applicability of its findings to performance pedagogy, remote rehearsal practices, concert-media design, and academic courses in musical art. Prospects for further research include the development of models of digital ensemble performance, criteria for evaluating media-mediated interpretation, and the study of new hybrid forms of musical presence in online environments

References

1. Григор’єва, М. С. (2025). Історично інформоване вокальне виконання у дзеркалі сучасних музикознавчих досліджень. Українська музика: науковий часопис, № 2(53), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-0926-2025-2-53-4

2. Сіньбінь, Фу (2024). Віртуальний хор як різновид цифрового музичного мистецтва. Культура України, 86, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.31516/2410-5325.086.08

3. Соколова, А. В. (2024). Віртуальні хори як актуальна форма сучасного event-art простору. Новий колегіум, Т.3, 15, 44-50. https://doi.org/10.34142/

nc.2024.3.44

4. Сухецька, О. (2022). Віртуальний хор: сутність явища та поняття. Вісник КНУКіМ. Серія «Мистецтвознавство», (46), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.3186

6/2410-1176.46.2022.258627

5. Цап, Г. В., Ковальчук, М. М., & Єфименко, Н. М. (2025). Інтерпретація української пісні в сучасному естрадному вокалі як чинник формування націо-

нального стилю. Слобожанські мистецькі студії, 3, 137–140. https://doi.org/10.32782/art/2025.3.25

6. Цюряк, І. (2025). Фортепіанне виконання ХХІ століття: традиції та новації. Актуальні питання гуманітарних наук, Вип. 85, том 3, 130–134. https://

doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/85-3-18

7. Alexandrakі, C., & Bader, R. (2016). Anticipatory networked communications for live musical interactions of acoustic instruments. Journal of New Music Research, 45(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2015.1131990

8. Ding, S.-U. (2006). Developing a rhythmic performance practice in music for piano and tape. Organised Sound, 11(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/

S1355771806001518

9. Gackle, L., & Fung, C. (2009). Bringing the East to the West: A case study in teaching Chinese choral music to a youth choir in the United States. Bulletin of

the Council for Research in Music Education. https://doi.org/10.2307/27861463

10. Hagan, K. L. (2016). The intersection of «live» and «real-time». Organised Sound, 21(2), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771816000066

11. Kjus, Y., & Danielsen, A. (2016). Live mediation: Performing concerts using studio technology. Popular Music, 35(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1017/

S0261143016000568

12. Leikin, A. (2002). Piano-roll recordings of Enrique Granados: A study of a transcription of the composer’s performance. Journal of Musicological Research, 21(3–4), 251–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411890208574796

13. Neuman, D. (2009). The production of aura in the gramophone age of the «live» performance. Asian Music, 40(1), 100–123. https://doi.org/10.1353/amu.0.0037

14. Ottosson, Å. (2017). The voice and its doubles: Media and music in Northern Australia (review). Oceania, 87(1), 107–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/ocea.5153

15. Palmer, C. (1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.115

16. Shaffer, L. H. (1995). Musical performance as interpretation. Psychology of Music, 23(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735695231002

17. Swarbrick, D., et al. (2019). How live music moves us: Head movement differences in audiences to live versus recorded music. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02682

18. Wall, T., & Dubber, A. (2010). Experimenting with fandom, live music, and the Internet: Applying insights from music fan culture to new media production. Journal of New Music Research, 39(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2010.489645

19. Wapnick, J., & Rosenquist, M.-J. (1991). Preferences of undergraduate music majors for sequenced versus performed piano music. Journal of

Research in Music Education, 39(2), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344695

20. Wapnick, J., et al. (1993). Consistency in piano performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41(4), 282–292. https://doi.

org/10.2307/3345504

21. Zhang, Q., & Negus, K. (2021). Stages, platforms, streams: The economies and industries of live music after digitalization. Popular Music and Society,

44(5), 539–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2021.1921909

Published

2026-05-29

Issue

Section

SECTION 2. MODERN STUDIES IN ART AREA